A sober look at Biblical problems

Last updated: 2008-05-07

This website represents one man's look at a fairly random selection of alleged Biblical contradictions, errors, and other problems. There are a few caveats that I should make my readers aware of:

Problems are arranged according to how severe they are for the doctrine of infallibilism: that is, the view that the Bible contains no errors. You might want to read my thoughts on how Christians should respond to these problems. I don't argue that Biblical errors are necessarily fatal for Christianity, merely a certain fundamentalist brand of it.


Serious problems

Problems here I judge to be severe - I don't see how the text can be correct.

Minor problems

Problems here have solutions of varying degrees of plausibility. You'll have to judge for yourself.

Weak problems

Problems here seem easy to answer, and I would never use them to argue that the Bible has errors. These are mostly here because they appear on some other website or websites.

Unclassified problems


This list is forever a work-in-progress

I started this page in March, 2008. My intention is to examine more alleged problems with the Bible as and when I find them. Email me at the following address (image is to foil spambots) with any suggestions:

(image) how to send me email

Various Christian and atheist (and indeed, Muslim) sources discuss hundreds of different Biblical problems. But I'm likely to focus on ones that I find interesting.

Why another page on this?

There are many pages listing Biblical problems. However, although it should be obvious that some problems are more serious than others, most sites opposed to "infallibilism" tend to throw them all at you at once, as if to impress you with their sheer number. I take a different approach, and try to classify problems according to how bad they are.

Ultimately, like those other sites, this website argues against "infallibilism". There are definitely errors in the Bible. Whether this alone renders the whole text worthless or not is up to you. I don't see any automatic reason why it should.

Acknowledgements

I have made much use of the following websites (listed in no particular order):

I should also thank the makers of the English Standard Version, my main Biblical source. It's not the Bible I would recommend personally, but I use it here because it's one that's broadly acceptable to most conservative Christians. (The Bible I would recommend is the New Revised Standard Version, which is similar in style but which makes no effort to harmonise contradictory passages.)

errancy.org - copyright notices