There's an incident in which a centurion's servant is healed through faith alone. But there's a discrepancy between Matthew and Luke. This is Matthew 8:5-6:
By contrast, this is Luke 7:2-3:
At first glance, Matthew and Luke's versions seem to contradict each other. However, many people have noted that "person X did Y" sometimes means "person X got others to do Y". John 19:1 is a classic example. And so, various inerrantists respond that "a centurion came forward to him" just means that the centurion sent messengers. This solution might have worked, but there's another problem with the passages. The story continues with Matthew 8:13:
In Matthew's account, when Jesus tells the centurion to "go", this surely means the centurion was actually present. I am grateful to Errancy.com for this point, which I had missed. I have therefore upgraded this problem to Serious.
On a different tack, the Apologetics Press suggests that Mark and Luke are actually talking about entirely separate incidents. But that's rather unlikely: in both cases the centurion or his messengers give the same speech about authority. Compare Matthew 8:9 with Luke 7:8.
On a third tack, 101 Contradictions Refuted says:
No, it is not possible. Luke 7:6-10 does not allow anything of the sort:
And Jesus went with them. When he was not far from the house, the centurion sent friends, saying to him, "Lord, do not trouble yourself, for I am not worthy to have you come under my roof. Therefore I did not presume to come to you. But say the word, and let my servant be healed.
It's clear enough that, in Luke's version, the centurion is never present himself.
Back to errancy.org main index